Dysphoria and the Urge to Advocate

Author:
•  Tim McGuinness, Ph.D. – Anthropologist, Scientist, Director of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc.

ABSTRACT

Dysphoria and the urgent wish for reality to be different often fuels a powerful desire to advocate or lead, especially after betrayal or harm. That energy can be healthy when it’s channeled into preparation, patience, and respect for scope, because real change happens through small, teachable acts that make people more independent over time. It becomes risky when urgency turns into rescuing, rule-bending, and identity seeking. The tell is simple: if members are growing steadier and needing you less, the role is aligned; if they orbit you for regulation and meetings get longer without progress, dysphoria is steering. Guardrails like consent before advice, clear time limits, skills first, and routine supervision convert heat into help. The goal is not to be central; the goal is to help people stand.

Dysphoria and the Urge to Advocate

Dysphoria, understood here as the wish for reality to be different from what it is, often sits just beneath the surface when someone feels a sudden pull to advocate or to lead a support group. The feeling is understandable. After harm or injustice, many want to convert pain into purpose, to make meaning, to ensure no one else goes through the same ordeal. That energy can become service. It can also become pressure, speed, and rescuing. When dysphoria leads, the role of advocate is sometimes treated as a fast path to a different self rather than a steady commitment to help others build capacity.

For a broader context on this concept, see the overview at scamsnow.com on dysphoria.

What dysphoria brings to the doorway

Dysphoria brings heat. It says the present is not acceptable and must change now. In the early weeks after discovery or disclosure, that heat feels righteous. It pushes you to act. It pushes you to speak. It pushes you to volunteer for everything. Heat is not the problem. Heat without structure is the problem.

Dysphoria also brings a story about identity. The self that was fooled, harmed, or silenced wants to be remade. “Advocate” becomes the new name. “Leader” becomes the new place to stand. Visibility looks like proof that you are not who the scammer said you were. This is human. It is also risky when you allow identity needs to sit in the driver’s seat.

Dysphoria brings a tug toward rescuing. Your ache softens when you ease someone else’s pain. You jump in. You answer quickly. You stay up late. You offer solutions before consent. You carry people from meeting to meeting. This calms you for a while. It also builds dependence and burns you out.

How dysphoria shows up in aspiring leaders

    • It often shows up as urgency. The person feels that change must happen now and that they must be the one to do it. Meetings turn into campaigns. The calendar fills. Measured steps feel intolerable. Pace becomes proof of care.
    • It shows up as identity seeking. The role becomes a new story about being strong, visible, or indispensable. The quiet practice of reliability gives way to performance. The room begins to orbit the helper rather than the mission.
    • It shows up as rescuing. The advocate absorbs the group’s pain to quiet their own ache. Consent is skipped. Advice arrives fast. Off-platform contact expands. Time boundaries soften. The person feels useful. Others learn to outsource regulation.
    • It shows up as rule-bending. Scope limits feel cold. Referral pathways feel like rejection. Confidentiality feels negotiable if breaking it seems to get results. The line between help and overreach blurs.

In facilitation, dysphoria tilts the room away from skills and toward catharsis. Sessions become long on venting and short on practice. Education segments shrink. Off platform contact grows because it feels like momentum. Boundaries begin to look unkind. Over time, the group starts to orbit the leader’s drive rather than the members’ growth.

When the drive helps and when it harms

Dysphoria can be channeled into service when it fuels preparation, patience, and respect for scope. You still want a better reality, yet you accept that “better” arrives through small, teachable acts repeated over time. You trade speed for steadiness. You trade being central for being consistent. You measure success by what members can do without you.

It harms when it demands transformation on contact. Survivors feel pushed. Leaders feel depleted. The program drifts toward crisis management and away from capacity building. The same story repeats each week, only louder. Everyone is busy. Progress is thin.

A steady lens helps. Advocacy exists to strengthen capacity, not to satisfy a personal need to feel powerful, visible, or redeemed. Facilitation exists to stabilize distress, teach practical tools, encourage accountability, and promote independence. If the work consistently centers the helper’s relief, dysphoria is in charge.

A brief self-screening for dysphoria-driven motivation

Use these questions as a quiet check. If several resonate, pause and reset before stepping forward.

    • Is the strongest wish to change how you feel about yourself rather than what members learn to do for themselves
    • Does praise or visibility feel necessary to keep going
    • Do clear limits feel like obstacles rather than safeguards
    • Do you feel uneasy or less valuable when members improve and need less contact
    • Do you feel pressure to answer quickly, to keep conversations going after hours, or to be the person who always says yes
    • Do you feel irritated when someone declines your advice or chooses a different path
    • Do you believe rules should bend for you because your intentions are good

Yes to several signals that dysphoria needs attention before leadership expands.

Two brief examples

    1. Leader A attends a weekly group. They read the rules every time. They keep time, ask for consent before giving ideas, and close the room on schedule. They offer one short skill and a simple debrief. Off platform, they are available inside clear hours and route crises to proper services. Members become steadier. Over months, they need less contact. Leader A feels satisfied and less central. This is dysphoria integrated and useful.
    2. Leader B launches a chat thread for continuous support. They answer at all hours. They post long advice lists. They share member stories with friends to get help. They skip training because there is too much to do. Members orbit them. Meetings lengthen and repeat. Leader B feels needed and exhausted. This is dysphoria driving the car.

Healthy guardrails that convert dysphoria into service

    • Clarity moderates drive. Written scope, ground rules, and referral pathways transform raw energy into predictable help. Keep touchstones simple and repeatable. Support is not rescue. Ask before advice. Skills first, then support. Hold the frame. These phrases counter dysphoria’s push for speed and control.
    • Consent slows rescuing. Ask a simple question. Are you open to ideas, or do you want to be heard right now
      If consent is no, reflect and validate. If consent is yes, offer options, not directives, then return choice to the member. Autonomy is the medicine.
    • Time boundaries protect everyone. Set availability windows. Close the room on time. Decline private crisis management. Post and repeat the plan for where crises belong. Boundaries are not cold. Boundaries are care.
    • Teach in the room. Offer short practices that members can repeat alone. Paced breathing. Five sense grounding. Two minute planning. When people feel relief from skills they can do without you, reliance on you decreases.
    • Supervision steadies the role. Regular debriefs help you notice when dysphoria has begun to steer choices. Feedback is not a verdict on character. It is a course correction that keeps the mission intact. Seek it. Use it.
    • Data over drama. Track simple indicators. Attendance stability. Percent of meeting time spent in skills. Number of off platform crisis loops. Referral follow-through. If numbers tilt the wrong way, you have an early warning.

Signs you are using the role to quiet your ache

    • You introduce yourself by your title more than by your name
    • You feel deflated when others lead a segment and receive thanks
    • You retell member stories without consent to show the importance of the work
    • You hold private side chats that repeat the same advice without change
    • You use spiritual or moral language to justify over functioning
    • You resent limits set by supervisors or program leads

None of these makes you a bad person. They are signals. Notice. Slow down. Recenter.

If the role is not yet a fit

If dysphoria is strong and the role begins to amplify it, the answer is not shame. The answer is redirection. There are many ways to serve without stepping into emotional containment.

    • Project work. Build resource lists. Draft plain language guides. Translate materials. Improve intake forms.
    • Operations. Manage scheduling. Set up meeting rooms. Maintain data hygiene. Review consent forms.
    • Outreach. Coordinate public education events. Help with policy briefs. Support partnerships with aligned groups.
    • Fundraising. Write grant drafts. Host small donor sessions with staff present.
    • Moderation. Support asynchronous forums with strong rules inside a defined scope.

In parallel, keep personal recovery active. Counseling, peer support with boundaries, body based practices, and rest help reduce the inner pressure to be remade by a public role.

Co-dependency and Dysphoria

Dysphoria and co-dependency often travel together in peer settings. Dysphoria craves a different self. Co-dependency offers a fast way to feel different by being needed. The loop is smooth. You rescue, you are thanked, you feel valuable, and your ache quiets for a while. Meanwhile the member’s growth stalls. The group drifts toward a social club that soothes pain without building capacity. If you notice this pull, use the same guardrails. Consent before advice. Skills first. Clear hours. Rotate roles. Refer outside scope.

Social Media and Dysphoria

Public platforms reward speed and visibility. Dysphoria loves both. A thread of hot takes feels like action. A flurry of likes feels like proof. Be careful. Public posting can feed identity needs while harming privacy, accuracy, and scope. Use social media for education and signposts, not for case work. Never share member details. Never promise outcomes. Always invite people back to structured settings with rules that protect them.

How Organizations Can Help Leaders Keep Dysphoria in its Place

Structure eases pressure on individuals. Programs can set the frame so that good people do not need to reinvent it.

  • Write scope statements that are short and plain. Review them often.
  • Require observation, assisting, and co-facilitation before solo leadership.
  • Provide regular supervision by trained leads. Make it normal.
  • Rotate tasks and leaders to prevent emotional hubs.
  • Post referral pathways and crisis instructions in every room and channel.
  • Collect simple metrics and share them with leaders.
  • Celebrate outcomes that show independence, not dependence.

When the frame is solid, dysphoria has fewer places to hijack the work.

A Practical Decision Rule

Watch outcomes over time. When dysphoria is integrated and the role fits, members become steadier and more independent. Meetings feel calmer and more useful. Skills are practiced. Referrals are used. Off-platform loops shrink. The leader becomes less central without feeling diminished.

When dysphoria is leading, members orbit the leader for regulation. Meetings lengthen without progress. Advice repeats. Boundary exceptions multiply. The leader’s identity depends on being needed. The first pattern points to readiness. The second calls for a pause.

A weekly self-check for advocates and facilitators

Keep it simple and repeatable.

    • What went well
    • What was hard
    • Where did I feel a pull to rescue or bend a rule
    • What boundary did I hold that protected someone
    • What skill did I teach that someone used
    • What will I adjust next time

Write brief notes. Share one line in supervision. Small corrections now prevent big repairs later.

Language that cools dysphoria in the moment

When you feel the urge to take over, reach for these lines.

    • Would you like ideas, or would you like to be heard
    • What have you already tried since last time
    • What feels possible in the next twenty-four hours
    • This deserves focused attention with a professional. We will be here while you work with them.
    • I care about this, and I also want you to build the skill to carry it between meetings.

Short, respectful, and clear. Each line returns ownership to the member.

Conclusion

Dysphoria explains why the urge to help can feel so strong and why it can run ahead of wisdom. You want a different reality for yourself and for others. That is honest. Honor the truth, then set firm structures around it. Let training, consent, scope, and supervision do their quiet work. Convert heat into habits. Measure success by what people can do without you. Accept that the best leaders grow less central as others grow more capable.

If you can live by a few steady lines, you are on solid ground. Support is not rescue. Ask before advice. Skills first, then support. Hold the frame. Refer when needed. Keep doing the next small right thing. Over time, the ache that pushed you to the doorway becomes fuel for the work, not the force that runs it. And the work does what it is supposed to do. It helps people stand.

Glossary

  • Advocacy — Purposeful actions that aim to strengthen survivors’ capacity rather than satisfy a helper’s need to feel useful.
  • Boundaries — Agreed limits on roles, time, and availability that protect autonomy and prevent dependence.
  • Capacity building — Teaching simple, repeatable skills so members can regulate and act without constant support.
  • Catharsis — Emotional venting that can soothe in the moment but, without structure, displaces skill practice.
  • Co-dependency — Over-involvement and reliance that replaces personal responsibility and stalls genuine recovery.
  • Consent-based help — Offering ideas only after permission to protect choice and reduce rescuing.
  • Dysphoria — The wish for reality to be different; a driver of urgency, rescuing, and identity seeking if unstructured.
  • Enmeshment — Blurred boundaries where members or leaders become responsible for each other’s emotions or outcomes.
  • Facilitation — The craft of protecting process, purpose, and fairness so the room does not depend on any one voice.
  • Ground rules — Clear, visible agreements that define scope, conduct, and confidentiality for the group.
  • Guardrails — Practical practices that keep work on mission, such as skills first, consent checks, and timekeeping.
  • Identity seeking — Using the role to remake the self as strong or indispensable instead of serving the group’s purpose.
  • Over-functioning — Doing for others what they can learn to do themselves, creating dependence and burnout.
  • Referral pathways — Defined routes to professionals for needs outside scope, such as therapy, legal, or crisis care.
  • Rescuing — Rapid advice or constant availability that relieves discomfort today while weakening autonomy tomorrow.
  • Scope — The specific boundaries of what a role includes and excludes to keep help ethical and effective.
  • Self-assessment — Ongoing reflection to test motivation, capacity, and fit for advocacy or facilitation.
  • Stepped care — Matching needs to the least intensive effective support and escalating when appropriate.
  • Supervision — Regular debrief and guidance that corrects drift, supports leaders, and safeguards standards.
  • Time boundaries — Start-and-end times and availability windows that limit off-hours crisis loops.
  • Urgency — The felt pressure to act now that, without structure, accelerates rescuing and rule-bending.
  • Venting — Expressing strong emotion; useful when contained and followed by skill practice and next steps.
  • Visibility seeking — Pursuing attention or status that shifts focus from member growth to optics.

5
(1)

Table of Contents

Subscribe to the SCARS Institute Newsletter

Site Search

Latest Articles

Please Rate This Article

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Please Leave Us Your Comment
Also, tell us of any topics we might have missed.

Leave a Reply

Your comments help the SCARS Institute better understand all scam victim/survivor experiences and improve our services and processes. Thank you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for your comment. You may receive an email to follow up. We never share your data with marketers.

SCARS INSTITUTE RESOURCES:

You can also find the SCARS Institute on Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, and TruthSocial

Updated 3/15/2025

Recent Reader Comments for All Articles

A Question of Trust

At the SCARS Institute, we invite you to do your own research on the topics we speak about and publish, Our team investigates the subject being discussed, especially when it comes to understanding the scam victims-survivors experience. You can do Google searches but in many cases, you will have to wade through scientific papers and studies. However, remember that biases and perspectives matter and influence the outcome. Regardless, we encourage you to explore these topics as thoroughly as you can for your own awareness.

Statement About Victim Blaming

Some of our articles discuss various aspects of victims. This is both about better understanding victims (the science of victimology) and their behaviors and psychology. This helps us to educate victims/survivors about why these crimes happened and to not blame themselves, better develop recovery programs, and to help victims avoid scams in the future. At times this may sound like blaming the victim, but it does not blame scam victims, we are simply explaining the hows and whys of the experience victims have.

These articles, about the Psychology of Scams or Victim Psychology – meaning that all humans have psychological or cognitive characteristics in common that can either be exploited or work against us – help us all to understand the unique challenges victims face before, during, and after scams, fraud, or cybercrimes. These sometimes talk about some of the vulnerabilities the scammers exploit. Victims rarely have control of them or are even aware of them, until something like a scam happens and then they can learn how their mind works and how to overcome these mechanisms.

Articles like these help victims and others understand these processes and how to help prevent them from being exploited again or to help them recover more easily by understanding their post-scam behaviors. Learn more about the Psychology of Scams at www.ScamPsychology.org

Psychology Disclaimer:

All articles about psychology and the human brain on this website are for information & education only

The information provided in this and other SCARS articles are intended for educational and self-help purposes only and should not be construed as a substitute for professional therapy or counseling.

Note about Mindfulness: Mindfulness practices have the potential to create psychological distress for some individuals. Please consult a mental health professional or experienced meditation instructor for guidance should you encounter difficulties.

While any self-help techniques outlined herein may be beneficial for scam victims seeking to recover from their experience and move towards recovery, it is important to consult with a qualified mental health professional before initiating any course of action. Each individual’s experience and needs are unique, and what works for one person may not be suitable for another.

Additionally, any approach may not be appropriate for individuals with certain pre-existing mental health conditions or trauma histories. It is advisable to seek guidance from a licensed therapist or counselor who can provide personalized support, guidance, and treatment tailored to your specific needs.

If you are experiencing significant distress or emotional difficulties related to a scam or other traumatic event, please consult your doctor or mental health provider for appropriate care and support.

Also read our SCARS Institute Statement about Professional Care for Scam Victims – click here

If you are in crisis, feeling desperate, or in despair please call 988 or your local crisis hotline.

PLEASE NOTE: Psychology Clarification

The following specific modalities within the practice of psychology are restricted to psychologists appropriately trained in the use of such modalities:

  • Diagnosis: The diagnosis of mental, emotional, or brain disorders and related behaviors.
  • Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalysis is a type of therapy that focuses on helping individuals to understand and resolve unconscious conflicts.
  • Hypnosis: Hypnosis is a state of trance in which individuals are more susceptible to suggestion. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including anxiety, depression, and pain.
  • Biofeedback: Biofeedback is a type of therapy that teaches individuals to control their bodily functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure. It can be used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety, and pain.
  • Behavioral analysis: Behavioral analysis is a type of therapy that focuses on changing individuals’ behaviors. It is often used to treat conditions such as autism and ADHD.
    Neuropsychology: Neuropsychology is a type of psychology that focuses on the relationship between the brain and behavior. It is often used to assess and treat cognitive impairments caused by brain injuries or diseases.

SCARS and the members of the SCARS Team do not engage in any of the above modalities in relationship to scam victims. SCARS is not a mental healthcare provider and recognizes the importance of professionalism and separation between its work and that of the licensed practice of psychology.

SCARS is an educational provider of generalized self-help information that individuals can use for their own benefit to achieve their own goals related to emotional trauma. SCARS recommends that all scam victims see professional counselors or therapists to help them determine the suitability of any specific information or practices that may help them.

SCARS cannot diagnose or treat any individuals, nor can it state the effectiveness of any educational information that it may provide, regardless of its experience in interacting with traumatized scam victims over time. All information that SCARS provides is purely for general educational purposes to help scam victims become aware of and better understand the topics and to be able to dialog with their counselors or therapists.

It is important that all readers understand these distinctions and that they apply the information that SCARS may publish at their own risk, and should do so only after consulting a licensed psychologist or mental healthcare provider.

Opinions

The opinions of the author are not necessarily those of the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. The author is solely responsible for the content of their work. SCARS is protected under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) section 230 from liability.

Disclaimer:

SCARS IS A DIGITAL PUBLISHER AND DOES NOT OFFER HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE, LEGAL ADVICE, FINANCIAL ADVICE, OR SERVICES THAT SCARS IS NOT LICENSED OR REGISTERED TO PERFORM.

IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE FOLLOWING ANY MEDICALLY RELATED INFORMATION PRESENTED ON OUR PAGES.

ALWAYS CONSULT A LICENSED ATTORNEY FOR ANY ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL MATTERS.

A LICENSED FINANCIAL OR TAX PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE ACTING ON ANY INFORMATION RELATING TO YOUR PERSONAL FINANCES OR TAX-RELATED ISSUES AND INFORMATION.

SCARS IS NOT A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR – WE DO NOT PROVIDE INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES. ANY INVESTIGATIONS THAT SCARS MAY PERFORM IS NOT A SERVICE PROVIDED TO THIRD-PARTIES. INFORMATION REPORTED TO SCARS MAY BE FORWARDED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AS SCARS SEE FIT AND APPROPRIATE.

This content and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for licensed or regulated professional advice. Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider, lawyer, financial, or tax professional with any questions you may have regarding the educational information contained herein. SCARS makes no guarantees about the efficacy of information described on or in SCARS’ Content. The information contained is subject to change and is not intended to cover all possible situations or effects. SCARS does not recommend or endorse any specific professional or care provider, product, service, or other information that may be mentioned in SCARS’ websites, apps, and Content unless explicitly identified as such.

The disclaimers herein are provided on this page for ease of reference. These disclaimers supplement and are a part of SCARS’ website’s Terms of Use

Legal Notices: 

All original content is Copyright © 1991 – 2025 Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc. (Registered D.B.A SCARS) All Rights Reserved Worldwide & Webwide. Third-party copyrights acknowledge.

U.S. State of Florida Registration Nonprofit (Not for Profit) #N20000011978 [SCARS DBA Registered #G20000137918] – Learn more at www.AgainstScams.org

SCARS, SCARS|INTERNATIONAL, SCARS, SCARS|SUPPORT, SCARS, RSN, Romance Scams Now, SCARS|INTERNATION, SCARS|WORLDWIDE, SCARS|GLOBAL, SCARS, Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams, Society of Citizens Against Romance Scams, SCARS|ANYSCAM, Project Anyscam, Anyscam, SCARS|GOFCH, GOFCH, SCARS|CHINA, SCARS|CDN, SCARS|UK, SCARS|LATINOAMERICA, SCARS|MEMBER, SCARS|VOLUNTEER, SCARS Cybercriminal Data Network, Cobalt Alert, Scam Victims Support Group, SCARS ANGELS, SCARS RANGERS, SCARS MARSHALLS, SCARS PARTNERS, are all trademarks of Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Inc., All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Contact the legal department for the Society of Citizens Against Relationship Scams Incorporated by email at legal@AgainstScams.org